Monday, January 14, 2008

The Party's Over

Confession—I have been coveting the Drama League's Fall Fellowship for many years. There are very few career development opportunities for directors and really nothing like this that combines assisting established directors with producing your own work. Both aspects of this program are fully realized and paid close attention to. This fall I was able to make connections in the theatre community that will keep me busy for a long time. Seven years of living in New York and producing my own work with an Off-off Broadway Theatre Company and three years at Drama School didn't provide me with the kind of innroads into the theatre community that my four months this fall did.

For the first time in a long time, I'm not anxious about my future as a director. The relationships I formed with established directors this fall helped me see how people make a life for themselves in this very precarious profession. All three directors I worked with, like me, have children. It was so good for me to hear about how they juggle their responsibilities to their families with a crazy free-lance professional life. Getting to know something about their professional histories also made me think about different ways I can make it all work. At the end of the day, I have to be able to live my life as fully as possible—it can't all be about where and what I'm directing next.

Thank you to the Drama League and its funders. Thank you to the three wonderful directors I worked with this fall—Diane Paulus, Marcia Milgrom Dodge and Evan Yionoulis. And thanks to the theatres I was fortunate enough to be involved with—The Public Theater, Theatre for a New Audience, and TheatreworksUSA. The impact that all of these people and organizations made on my life in the theatre is immeasuarble!

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

On Autophagy, and Rehearsal Thereof...

There is always a point in the rehearsal process where I have to remind myself of why I chose to direct this play. Not because I'm dissuaded of its value, but because I need to return to the initial impulse, the feeling that came over me when I was first introduced to it: the moment that stopped me in my tracks and made me want to spend time creating this world on stage.

The play I'm directing for the Drama League Directorfest 2007, Autophagy, is a new play by a Chicago playwright named Sean Graney. I directed another play of his called En Mortem in 2003 for a company I formerly ran in Chicago called Flush Puppy Productions.

When I first read Autophagy, I felt like I was struck with an anvil. The play compacts a very complex series of events and emotions into 20 minutes that include among other things: an android, the revelation of a life-changing event, live music, violence against a doll, demonstration of an abusive relationship, and an offstage tragedy that changes everything. These things are often hilarious, and they happen so quickly and jarringly that they feel like they're coming out of nowhere. And before one has time to think about it, another event occurs.

The play left me stunned. I was upset, confused, and somehow in complete agreement with what just happened. I knew then that this was a play I wanted to do. It left me with more questions than answers, it made me remember something about my own life, and think about the world in a new way.

As I looked at a run-through of the play in rehearsal the other day, I was terrified that I had gone horribly off-track. The play lacked the excitement that I knew it should have. What had I done wrong?

I went back to the play. I put myself in that place, sitting at my desk, when I read it last summer. I remembered everything: the pace at which I read it, the surprise I felt when each event happened, the arc of the song, and the shock of the end.

What we had done, I realized, was an important part of a rehearsal process: we made the play make sense. The actors and I had worked hard at creating something that, for us, had a through line, linear thought, relationship and understanding. We played out each beat, figuring out how each event triggered the next. But the effect on the audience was no longer jarring and hilarious. The play should always be one step ahead of the audience, leaving them surprised and delighted by each new and strange moment, but instead the audience was right there with the characters, following the linear progression.

Now the actors and I know why everything happens in the order in which it does, and now all we need to do is not show each of those steps to the audience. In the next few rehearsals we will tighten the gaps, speed it up, and because of the foundation we have laid in the past week, this will be simple for us. With some adjustments we will bring the play back to the excitement of that first read, but with the depth of the investigative work we have done to get there.

-Joanie Schultz

Thursday, December 6, 2007

A One Act Play, Please . . . Anybody?

Quite honestly, one of the most difficult aspects of the Drama League Fellowship was finding a one act play I felt strongly about that was appropriate for DirectorFest. That sounds odd, given the sheer volume of short plays out in the world, nevertheless, finding that perfect piece feels like hunting a needle in a hay stack.

First, are the simple limitations of the production: three or fewer actors, twenty to thirty minutes in length. Production values are relatively high, but small plays are necessary. No flying scenery or turntables in this one! The purpose of DirectorFest is to introduce a group of new directors to the theatre community. So, ideally, the play you select should tell the theatre community something about you—about your temperament, your taste, your aesthetic, and frankly, show the world what you’re good at. Hmm. What is it I’m good at, exactly? Oh yeah, and I should REALLY like the play—love it, in fact.

I wanted to do a new(ish) play, to avoid comparisons to memorable productions of more famous one act plays. So that narrowed the field. I also wanted to discover a new author—new to me, at least. My copious and borderline obsessive script reading lead me very quickly to the catalogue at New Dramatists, where I could read synopses and breakdowns of every play by each of their members, past and present. As the writers at New Dramatists are some of the best in the American Theatre, this was a goldmine. I found a lot of great short plays and ultimately settled on one that was also recommended by a friend. Julia Cho’s The 100 Most Beautiful Names of Todd was my ultimate selection.

This remarkable little play met all of my needs. Its poetic structure calls out for an inventive and unusual staging scheme, yet the characters are richly drawn humanistic creations. The play is a deep exploration of life’s biggest questions—what happens to us when we die? How could I manage if I lost a parent? A partner? Is there a God? If so, why does he/she allow bad things to happen to good people? It is also a comic piece about first love and how a mother and daughter navigate the teenage years. In short, it’s a rich play for me, for the actors and for designers to all bite into. Professionally, it gave me the opportunity to work with two very talented teenage actors, a first for me. All told, it’s turned out to be the perfect play. Who knew such a thing existed?

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Director Fest 2007

So the time has finally come- after the week of wonder, a mountain retreat, and months of assistant directing, the drama league sheds its protective covering and exposes us to the world. For Director Fest 2007, I will be directing Don Evans’, Sugar Mouth Sam- Don’t Dance No More. I’ve wanted to direct this play for quite some time. I had known the playwright prior to his death and was a great admirer of his work. More importantly, I wanted to pick a play that best captured my voice as a director, provided a group of actors with great meaty roles, and took an audience on an emotional rollercoaster leaving them wanting to see more. With this play, I got that and more.
When approaching this play, I took to heart the advice I got from Bob Moss, “When directing a play, one should do the following, pick a great play, work with great actors, create a good ground plan and, get the Hell out of the way.” However, after this experience, I would add a few things to the list. For starters, be specific. When working on a play – especially when you have to do it in a week- it is always good to convey to not only your actors, but also, your designers the story you are looking to tell. Sugar Mouth Sam… is the story of a man trying to get his woman to believe in him just one more time and the startling realization that she is no longer able to do so. However, when one reads this play, it is so easy to believe that it is Verda’s story. I learned this in the very first reading of the play with the cast. Fortunately we were doing table work and I was able to show the actors the various switches in the play which leads the audience to follow Sammy’s story. Once the story was clarified for the actors, they were able to find the various colors of not only Sammy & Verda’s relationship, but also, Verda’s denial & acceptance of the real Sammy.
The second ingredient I would add to this recipe of directing is patience. Having known this script for quite some time, I know who these characters are; however, the actor comes to the process as a blank slate. My first inclination was to quickly block and set the play and allow the actors to catch up to me. But actors aren’t robots. One can not just input a series of commands and watch them go. They too have a process and it is the director’s honor to provide them with the tools they need to prosper while maneuvering through the world of the play. Sugar Mouth Sam. . . is a wordy play and I couldn’t wait for the day they were off book. It was only then that I knew I would be able to really push the actors where I knew they were trying to go. But again, I had to have patience. Unfortunately for me and one of my actors, that day didn’t come until the day before opening. However, once she was completely off book we were able to find other levels and sodalities which helped in making the production even better.
The last and most important ingredient I would add is faith. When ever there was a problem or it looked like things were going to become horribly bad, I learned to remind myself that I was a good director and that at the end of the day everything was going to be okay. I had to have faith in my actors, the process, my education and without a doubt God and though my show is less than 48 hours away and I feel like a virgin on prom night, I am a strong believer of Isaiah 54: 17 “. . . No weapon formed against me shall prosper”, which I understand as, anything that gets in my way, He’ll take care of.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

And So It Begins

Wonder week isn’t over five minutes and I am on a Peter Pan bus on my way to Syracuse, NY to begin working on “Les Liaisons Dangereuses” at Syracuse Stage. I will be assisting the former Artistic Director and to my luck directing the understudy production. It is a Lort C company that is also apart of Syracuse University. Prior to my beginning on “Les Liaisons” I will be directing “Week 42” of Susan Lori Parks’ “365 Plays” with some of the BFA students. School hasn’t started yet, but the B.F.A’s are eager to begin. We began by just reading “Week 42” along with “The 3 Constance” [The set of plays that everyone does if they are participating]. Their initial reaction was “What the hell is this?” Fortunately, I have a lot of experience working with grad and undergrad students and was therefore ready for such a reaction. We spent the first few days just reading the text and trying to find our way into it. All in all, I would be directing 10 of Susan Lori Parks’ “356 plays.” Everything had already been cast [without my input] and I found myself in the position that I have grown rather comfortable with – teacher.
The biggest hurtle for the actors to over come was understanding the world Parks was creating with this collection of works, as well as, her very specific use of language. To address this problem, I pulled other pieces from the collection of “356 Plays” that I thought might be more attainable for them. This addressed both problems and led the actors to a very beautiful discovery. Though Parks’ writing was very specific, there was room for tremendous interpretation. Once discovered, this notion of interpretation became extremely liberating for the actors. All of the sudden, it was as if I had struck a match in their minds - their imaginations were burning with ideas and the only ways to put out the fire was to begin exploring “Week 42” on our feet. With only a few days left, we quickly blocked and set all 10 plays. While working with the actors, my only guideline was to stay true to the text. Often when dealing with young actors, I find they have a tendency to paraphrase text as apposed to staying true to it; however, Parks’ is not a writer for which this is a good idea. Every word she sets to a page has a purpose. There is a rhythm to her writing and if you paraphrase it, you loose the essence of what she is trying to create.
Finally, after a week and a half of working, the day of showing had arrived. No one at this institution knew me, the director of “Les Liaisons Dangereuses” (for whom I would be assisting), all of the faculty and staff of Syracuse stage, as well as their New Artistic Director would be in attendance. Damn! Needles to say, I felt as thought I needed to have gotten this right. As the house and stage began to cross fade, I put my head down in a little prayer, “Lord, please allow me to have made the right decisions. Please let them understand what I’ve done. Please don’t let me make an ass out of myself. . .” And all of the sudden, there was laughter, I looked up and it had begun. I looked around the house and noticed the audience thoroughly enjoying themselves, and more importantly the actors – who were once so intimidated by this work – were enjoying themselves. And in an instant, it didn’t matter anymore. We had worked hard over the course of the last 10 days and I knew that both the actors and I had done the absolute best we could. As the performance brought itself to a close, the actors were met by a standing ovation. I couldn’t have been more proud of them if they were my own children.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Into the Mountains

So wonder week is over, I have been introduced to more important people in theatre than I could have ever imagined, I have a deeper understanding of how theatre in New York works, and I am hungry for more. At exactly 8:45 in the morning we begin our descent into the mountains. It is a large 15 passenger van and somehow, by the grace of God, all 12 of us [Four directors, 6 out of 8 actors, plus Roger & Emily]with ALL of our bags managed to fit in. As we began our exodus for the city, bobbing and weaving in New York traffic, we began trying to break the ice by sharing tad-bits our lives hoping to find some connection. Right away I noticed that these weren’t just some actors that Roger had found on the streets but artist who had an invested interest and belief in the drama league. They all were actors who had been making a living acting and were excited about working with us. Several hours had passed and we were just making our way up the mountain. Our destination was just 20 minutes away and my mind began to wonder, “Am I ready?”
During the summer, Roger had informed us all of what our assignments would be. We all would be directing a scene from Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya, a pair of monologues – which the actors would choose – and finally a pitch. I read Uncle Vanya backwards and forward more times than I would care to admit, as well as numerous critiques of Chekhov’s work. The play that I had been given to pitch was John Ford’s Tis Pity She a Whore, where again I labored in researching the play as best I could. Hell, I hadn’t done this much work since I was in grad school. And yet, in spite of all the work I’d done, while just minutes away from the retreat, my heart was pounding, pumping fear & doubt throughout every vein in my body. We arrived. After a quick lunch and brief unpacking we found ourselves in the barn where we were introduced to Tim Vassen [Our master Director] and began the process of really getting to know each other. By the end of the day we had had our first rehearsal and first performance. Without a doubt, theses were no ordinary actors or at least not the type of actors I had become accustomed to working with. With each project I encountered, where I had to work with the actors, I got a better understanding of what a true collaboration between a Director and Actor SHOULD BE. So often I had worked with actors who’d come to the table saying “tell me what you” as apposed to “theses are some of the ideas I would like to try.” With every project I worked on, I experienced a feeling of give & take that I can hardly express in words. It was like being in the perfect relationship- fresh, new and exciting while at the same time safe, familiar and sublimely comfortable. This relationship made it so much easier for me to relax when dealing with Chekhov.
I had directed Chekhov’s, The Seagull before with a rather mediocre response and was worried that I might not do so well with Uncle Vanya. At our first rehearsal, we began as usual with table work and it was the easiest thing I had ever done in my life. We all knew what we were talking about and together we were pushing each other to a deeper understanding of the text. By the end of the first rehearsal, the actors were jumping out of their seats to start blocking. Over the course of the next few days, we moved in perfect syncopation. We had found the perfect location for the scene, The actors were vigorously learning the lines while at the same finding new discoveries within the text and all I had to do was get out of the way while providing the actors with the necessary tools to create the world of the scene. I felt as though I was Picasso, standing before a blank canvas – staring at it’s nakedness for hours before making the first stroke, being careful to listen to what it wants to be and not imposing my own pre -determined thoughts.
Finally, the time had come for the showing. Immediately, those feelings of fear and doubt return. “What if everyone sees my work and realizes that I can’t direct?” The story of The Emperor’s New Clothes was very present in my mind. One by one we presented our scenes and they all, including yours truly, were well received. Afterwards, there was a party where we all shared our thoughts with each other about the night of scenes.
I awoke the next morning with sense of accomplishment [ as well as a slight hang over] and was eager to get started on my first A.D. assignment. I walked away from this experience with a new and profound confidence in my abilities as a director. Yes, that voice of doubt will always be there – but it is my ability to over come it which will make me a great director. As we begin moving down the mountain the thirst for directing is growing more and more.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Wonder Week

To my astonishment, I was accepted into the Drama League’s Fall Directing program. Right away I began receiving emails from Roger & Emily informing me of Wonder week, Director Fest & the Director’s retreat. Upon first receiving my acceptance I was filled with excitement and apprehension- excited because I am about to take my career to another level and apprehensive, not of the program, but that I might not cut the mustard. Having received my acceptance somewhere in April and not starting until August, needless to say, this summer was one on the longest I have ever experienced.
It was August 15th and I met my fellow directing colleagues. We are all uniquely different yet very similar in our great thirst for directing. Right way we are introduced to all of the Drama League staff [Family] and we are provided with the Wonder Week schedule. Now I see why they call it Wonder Week – because it’s a wonder that we’ll be able to meet that many people in such a short amount of time. Over the course of the next 6 days we schlep our way all over Manhattan to meet some of the most important people in theatre in New York [And I might also add, were taken to some very nice restaurants by Drama League members and supporters]. We are not only introduced to major producers of both commercial and non profit theatre but also agents, costumers, casting directors, Artistic directors and the office of SSDC. By the end of this week it felt like I had been given THE KEY to the golden gate. At the same time it forced me to really begin to think [re-evaluate] not my skills as a director but my over all mission as an artist.
On one of the last days of wonder week there was a very open and honest discussion with several New York artistic directors. Each company [As well as the head strong, & highly opinionated AD’s] was very different and as they spoke I realized that they all shared a common thought -- Producing works that were important to them. This may sound like such a simple thought but very often I have found myself directing a play that didn’t speak to but was capable of playing bills for a few months. So often, we as artist, get caught up in allowing outside factors to dictate some of the artistic choices we make and sometimes forget that the plays we decide to invest our blood, sweat & tears in should be a reflection of the world we see as flittered through the very core of our souls.
After leaving this round table discussion, I walked away with not only a new perspective but a deeper respect of the craft we call directing. In deed, I can’t wait to see what is next. It is as if I am starving man in the middle of the desert and the only thing I need to survive, is to direct.